I think the President has done an excellent job of scaring the crap out of everyone over the sequester. The administration has used all of the key department heads to get on national TV and warn the country that some very terrible things are about to happen. Liberal Senators and Congressman have all chimed in with the fear talk. But today we went totally over the top.
Maxine Waters has said that the sequester could cost as many as 170,000,000 jobs. That would be some feat Maxine, there are only 150m workers in the country. I doubt the sequester will put them all out of work, much less the extra 20m.
The CBO did a quick review of the sequester today. The cuts for the balance of the fiscal year come to $42b; an amount that is equivalent to 45 points on Apple’s market capitalization. I have trouble believing that the country is going to fall off the cliff with a 2% cut in government spending.
The sequester was designed to be a meat axe. The assumption by most observers was that it was would be such a dumb thing to implement, that both sides would come up with a more workable alternative. This sets up the worst-case scenario where a relatively small reduction in spending results in headline problems. While Ms Water’s projections will not be realized, there could be flight delays, disruptions in the food supply and other visible issues.
If some of the scare talk about the sequester becomes a reality, there is going to be hell to pay. The question is, Who is going to get blamed?
Obama won the election. Mitt got 47% of the votes, Obama got 51%. There is no mandate behind that result. Of those over 18, only 58% voted. The 120 million who did not vote may not have cared about the election, but their voices might be heard if the grocery store runs out of meat. I would not be surprised if some of the 30 million teenagers get involved.
The answer to the question of who gets blamed is, “All of them”. I see a silver lining in that outcome. As stupid as the sequester is, I hope it causes all sorts of distortions. I want Obama to take every step possible to make it as painful as possible. (I think the President will do just that.) His motivation will be to get public support to swing further from the Republicans. Obama might end up with a public reaction that he can’t contain. Not much of a legacy.
Notes:
- S&P plays into this story. When it downgraded the USA it made the reasoning behind the decision clear. It was not a reflection of the inherent strength of the USA, the reason was the inability of D.C. to do anything but go from month-to-month year-to-year with no budgets and no plans. On that basis, I thought the downgrade was justified. Based on what is about to unfold, another notch downward would also be justified.
- The Sequester may prove to be a pain in the ass that causes more problems than anticipated. It’s still a side show to the Main Event. There are now 26 days before the government is forced to shut down. Either a budget is passed by Congress or a Continuing Resolution is required. As of today, I see zero possibility of a fix on on the CR.
Appreciation for the brilliant information! I just came across your blog andl ike the content. I look forward to reading your blog posts in the future,
Federal employees were given raises earler this year. Now sequestration is going to make jobs disappear?
So far in 2013, how many of you BK readers have gotten a raise in 2013?
I live off off interest (down to about zero) and cap gains and losses. It’s tough out there….
I think the real fear is from the President and the Democratic party. From the president because if he is forced to “cave” on reducing spending without increasing taxes, it could open the flood gates of defeats, next being the looming debt ceiling deadline. From the Democratic party because if they are forced to cave on reducing spending, it will be virtually the first time ever that a meaningful across-the-board spending decrease has actually occurred, and will set the precedent for further decreases – especially once the Public sees that all the fear mongering was unfounded.
In summary, if Obama looses this one, he will be exposed as the “Emperor who has no clothes”.
I agree with you about the fears of the sequester being overplayed and somewhat exaggerated. I say “somewhat” because I actually do believe that some damage will be inflicted on quite a few people, although I don’t believe the damage will be as extensive as what they say it will be.
As someone who is dependent on entitlement programs (Social Security and Medicare) for my survival, this whole thing does scares me quite a bit. The reason for my fear is because I think that if the Republican Party doesn’t cave-in on their position of demanding more cuts to entitlement programs, that President Obama will be the one who caves in. If he does, people like me will be very hurt by his actions. My fears about this happening are mainly deepened by the fact that the president seems very willing to allow both Medicare and Social Security to be put on the bargaining table.
To me it is very disheartening that vital entitlement programs that people depend on for their basic survival are even put into this mix, especially when we all know that if the government was to cut out some of it’s porkbarrel projects, tax breaks for the rich and corporations, and unnecessary defense spending that entitlement programs wouldn’t even have to be touched, let alone threatened with draconian cuts by a bunch of self-righteous, posturing bastards.
BK says—— I see zero possibility of a fix on on the CR.—–
Zero Hedge the thing.
Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive read something like this just before. So nice to uncover somebody with some original thoughts on this topic. realy thank you for beginning this up. this internet site is some thing that is needed on the web, an individual having a little originality. useful job for bringing something new to the web!
[url=http://www.bagsmkoutlet.com]michael kors bag[/url]